Im betting some players already have few thousand games on this season as well. So if rank system is indeed based on percentage of wins, it is unfair towards regular players, who would have to win more and more matches to notice change in the rank. Ursprünglich geschrieben von Meelis13:But how come? Troughout my RL experience, i do have 51 percent win rate in overall- and i do mean overall, including casual & season 1 matches. Think of a loss to lesser opposition as 2 wins against same or higher competition to offset the effect. If you start consistently winning 6-7/10 matches against the same or higher rank, you're trending towards a 60% win/loss ratio again and will likely increase in rank. As long as you don't lose to people below you, the ranking won't change past that point. To change win percentage from say, 50, theyd have to win at least 100 games to notice a difference Which is why people are pushing for some form of consistently reliable measure instead of a win/loss ratio vs all of your opponents' win/loss ratios, particularly 2v2 and 3v3.Īt the moment, you get to a maximum win/loss ratio, then stagnate as the system pushes you towards a 50% ratio. But how come? Troughout my RL experience, i do have 51 percent win rate in overall- and i do mean overall, including casual & season 1 matches.
Playing 10 matches and winning half of them SHOULD drop your ranking if it continues to occur, as you're trending towards a 50% win rate, especially if those losses included games against poor opposition. Ursprünglich geschrieben von Noidenous:Let's assume you have a 60% win rate.
0 kommentar(er)
